Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: natural history and impact. / Fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas: historia natural e impacto.

Osteoporosis, and the consequences derived from it, such as fragility fractures, constitute a growing public health problem. Suffering from a fracture of this nature is the main risk factor for suffering a new fracture. It is documented that vertebral compression fractures lead to significant morbidity and mortality, in the short and long term, as well as other complications, such as sagittal imbalance and hyperkyphosis of the segment. However, we have not found documentation that analyzes the medium and long-term consequences of these injuries, assessing the type of treatment used, and the economic impact they represent. The purpose of this review is to analyze the main recent literature on the subject and make a breakdown of the consequences of these fractures in various spheres, such as economic, quality of life, sagittal balance and radiographic parameters, pain or mortality; as well as a brief analysis of epidemiology and natural history. Conclusion: Osteoporotic fractures constitute an emerging problem, both in the medical and economic fields. The consequences and sequelae on the patient are multiple and although surgical options offer good long-term results, it is necessary to properly select the patient, through multidisciplinary teams, to try to minimize potential complications.

El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales: una revisión narrativa / The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review

Introducción: Las metástasis vertebrales son un problema muy frecuente y asocian un deterioro importante de la calidad de vida en los pacientes oncológicos. El objetivo de esta revisión es determinar el encaje de las técnicas quirúrgicas mínimamente invasivas dentro del manejo de esta entidad. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en las bases de datos Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus y Cochrane. Se revisaron los artículos publicados en los últimos 10 años que fueran de una relevancia y calidad adecuadas. Resultados: Tras el cribado de los 2.184 trabajos identificados inicialmente en las distintas bases de datos, se incluyeron un total de 24 artículos en esta revisión. Conclusión: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna es especialmente útil en pacientes oncológicos frágiles con metástasis vertebrales por la reducida comorbilidad que presentan las técnicas que se engloban en ella en comparación con la de la cirugía abierta convencional. Los avances en tecnología aplicada a la cirugía, como la navegación y la robótica, mejoran la precisión y reducen las complicaciones de esta técnica.(AU)

Background: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. Methods: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. Results: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. Conclusion: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.(AU)

[Translated article] The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review / El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales: una revisión narrativa

Introducción: Las metástasis vertebrales son un problema muy frecuente y asocian un deterioro importante de la calidad de vida en los pacientes oncológicos. El objetivo de esta revisión es determinar el encaje de las técnicas quirúrgicas mínimamente invasivas dentro del manejo de esta entidad. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en las bases de datos Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus y Cochrane. Se revisaron los artículos publicados en los últimos 10 años que fueran de una relevancia y calidad adecuadas. Resultados: Tras el cribado de los 2.184 trabajos identificados inicialmente en las distintas bases de datos, se incluyeron un total de 24 artículos en esta revisión. Conclusión: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna es especialmente útil en pacientes oncológicos frágiles con metástasis vertebrales por la reducida comorbilidad que presentan las técnicas que se engloban en ella en comparación con la de la cirugía abierta convencional. Los avances en tecnología aplicada a la cirugía, como la navegación y la robótica, mejoran la precisión y reducen las complicaciones de esta técnica.(AU)

Background: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. Methods: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. Results: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. Conclusion: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.(AU)

El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales (parte 1): una revisión clínica / The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis (part 1): A clinical review

Las metástasis espinales representan una importante carga sobre la calidad de vida en los pacientes afectados por una enfermedad oncológica activa, debido a la alta incidencia de síndromes dolorosos, deformidad espinal y deterioro neurológico. La cirugía juega un papel determinante a la hora de mejorar la calidad de vida mediante el control del dolor, el restablecimiento de la función neurológica y el mantenimiento de la estabilidad espinal, además de contribuir a la respuesta de la terapia médica. La cirugía mínimamente invasiva (MIS) es una opción de tratamiento en determinados pacientes con alto riesgo quirúrgico, ya que tiene una baja tasa de complicaciones, de sangrado intraoperatorio, de estancia hospitalaria y ofrece resultados similares a la cirugía abierta. Presentamos en esta revisión el papel de la MIS en esta enfermedad, y algunos casos tratados en nuestro centro hospitalario.(AU)

Spinal metastases represent a significant burden on the quality of life in patients affected by active oncological disease due to the high incidence of pain syndromes, spinal deformity, and neurological impairment. Surgery plays a decisive role in improving quality of life by controlling pain, restoring neurological function and maintaining spinal stability, as well as contributing to the response to medical therapy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a treatment option in certain patients with high surgical risk since it has a low rate of complications, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and offers similar results to open surgery. In this review, we present the role of MIS in this pathology and some cases treated in our hospital.(AU)

[Translated article] The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis (Part 1): A clinical review / El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales (parte 1): una revisión clínica

Las metástasis espinales representan una importante carga sobre la calidad de vida en los pacientes afectados por una enfermedad oncológica activa, debido a la alta incidencia de síndromes dolorosos, deformidad espinal y deterioro neurológico. La cirugía juega un papel determinante a la hora de mejorar la calidad de vida mediante el control del dolor, el restablecimiento de la función neurológica y el mantenimiento de la estabilidad espinal, además de contribuir a la respuesta de la terapia médica. La cirugía mínimamente invasiva (MIS) es una opción de tratamiento en determinados pacientes con alto riesgo quirúrgico, ya que tiene una baja tasa de complicaciones, de sangrado intraoperatorio, de estancia hospitalaria y ofrece resultados similares a la cirugía abierta. Presentamos en esta revisión el papel de la MIS en esta enfermedad, y algunos casos tratados en nuestro centro hospitalario.(AU)

Spinal metastases represent a significant burden on the quality of life in patients affected by active oncological disease due to the high incidence of pain syndromes, spinal deformity, and neurological impairment. Surgery plays a decisive role in improving quality of life by controlling pain, restoring neurological function and maintaining spinal stability, as well as contributing to the response to medical therapy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a treatment option in certain patients with high surgical risk since it has a low rate of complications, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and offers similar results to open surgery. In this review, we present the role of MIS in this pathology and some cases treated in our hospital.(AU)

[Translated article] The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. METHODS: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. RESULTS: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.

[Translated article] The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis (Part 1): A clinical review.

Spinal metastases represent a significant burden on the quality of life in patients affected by active oncological disease due to the high incidence of pain syndromes, spinal deformity, and neurological impairment. Surgery plays a decisive role in improving quality of life by controlling pain, restoring neurological function and maintaining spinal stability, as well as contributing to the response to medical therapy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a treatment option in certain patients with high surgical risk since it has a low rate of complications, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and offers similar results to open surgery. In this review, we present the role of MIS in this pathology and some cases treated in our hospital.

The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis (part 1): A clinical review. / El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales (parte 1): una revisión clínica.

Spinal metastases represent a significant burden on the quality of life in patients affected by active oncological disease due to the high incidence of pain syndromes, spinal deformity, and neurological impairment. Surgery plays a decisive role in improving quality of life by controlling pain, restoring neurological function and maintaining spinal stability, as well as contributing to the response to medical therapy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a treatment option in certain patients with high surgical risk since it has a low rate of complications, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and offers similar results to open surgery. In this review, we present the role of MIS in this pathology and some cases treated in our hospital.

The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review. / El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales: una revisión narrativa.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. METHODS: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. RESULTS: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.

[Impact of COVID-19 pandemic confinement on musculoskeletal pain and quality of life]. / Impacto del confinamiento por la pandemia COVID-19 en el dolor musculoesquelético y la calidad de vida.

INTRODUCTION: in March 2020, lockdown was established in Spain because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study is to assess its impact on pain and quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: prospective study including 490 individuals grouped in: 140 people without pain, 140 people with musculoskeletal pain but without any related pathology diagnosed, 140 patients diagnosed for a musculoskeletal condition and 70 patients in surgical waiting list (SWL) for a musculoskeletal condition. Data regarding pain, physical activity and quality of life (EuroQol-5D) was collected at the beginning of lockdown and one year after (March 2021). RESULTS: mean age was 53 ± 17.5 years old (18-88) and 51.3% were women. Patients in SWL referred significantly more pain than the rest of groups (p < 0.001), with a score in the visual analogue scale of 6.3 ± 1.9. Groups 3 and 4 suffered a significant increase of their pain from 2020 to 2021 (p < 0.001), while decreasing in group 2 (p < 0.001). Analgesics intake grew from 2020 to 2021 (39.9% versus 44.3%, p = 0.007). 70.2% experienced a worsening of at least one dimension of EuroQol-5D over last year, with patients in SWL being the most affected (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: lockdown has caused in patients with musculoskeletal conditions a greater aggravation of pain and deterioration of quality of life than in the general population, especially in patients in SWL, translating in an increase in analgesics intake.

INTRODUCCIÓN: en Marzo de 2020 se estableció el confinamiento en España debido a la pandemia por COVID-19. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar su impacto en el dolor y la calidad de vida de personas con dolor osteomuscular. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo que incluyó 490 personas agrupadas en: 140 personas sin dolor (grupo 1), 140 personas con dolor osteomuscular, pero sin patología diagnosticada (grupo 2), 140 pacientes con patología musculoesquelética (grupo 3) y 70 pacientes en lista de espera quirúrgica (LEQ) por patología musculoesquelética (grupo 4). Se recogieron datos sobre el dolor, la actividad física y la calidad de vida (EuroQol-5D) al inicio del confinamiento y un año después. RESULTADOS: la edad media fue de 53 ± 17.5 años (18-88) y 51.3% fueron mujeres. Las personas en LEQ refirieron un dolor significativamente mayor que el resto de grupos (p < 0.001) con una puntuación en la escala visual analógica del dolor de 6.3 ± 1.9. Los grupos 3 y 4 sufrieron un aumento significativo de su dolor desde 2020 hasta 2021 (p < 0.001), mientras que en el grupo 2 disminuyó (p < 0.001). El consumo de analgésicos creció de 2020 a 2021 (39.9% versus 44.3%, p = 0.007); 70.2% sufrió un empeoramiento en alguna de las dimensiones del EuroQol-5D, siendo el grupo en LEQ el más afectado (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONES: el confinamiento ha producido en pacientes con patología musculoesquelética un empeoramiento del dolor y de calidad de vida mayor que en el resto de personas, especialmente en aquéllas en espera de cirugía, traduciéndose en un aumento del consumo de analgésicos.

Impacto del confinamiento por la pandemia COVID-19 en el dolor musculoesquelético y la calidad de vida / Impact of COVID-19 pandemic confinement on musculoskeletal pain and quality of life

Resumen: Introducción: En Marzo de 2020 se estableció el confinamiento en España debido a la pandemia por COVID-19. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar su impacto en el dolor y la calidad de vida de personas con dolor osteomuscular. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo que incluyó 490 personas agrupadas en: 140 personas sin dolor (grupo 1), 140 personas con dolor osteomuscular, pero sin patología diagnosticada (grupo 2), 140 pacientes con patología musculoesquelética (grupo 3) y 70 pacientes en lista de espera quirúrgica (LEQ) por patología musculoesquelética (grupo 4). Se recogieron datos sobre el dolor, la actividad física y la calidad de vida (EuroQol-5D) al inicio del confinamiento y un año después. Resultados: La edad media fue de 53 ± 17.5 años (18-88) y 51.3% fueron mujeres. Las personas en LEQ refirieron un dolor significativamente mayor que el resto de grupos (p < 0.001) con una puntuación en la escala visual analógica del dolor de 6.3 ± 1.9. Los grupos 3 y 4 sufrieron un aumento significativo de su dolor desde 2020 hasta 2021 (p < 0.001), mientras que en el grupo 2 disminuyó (p < 0.001). El consumo de analgésicos creció de 2020 a 2021 (39.9% versus 44.3%, p = 0.007); 70.2% sufrió un empeoramiento en alguna de las dimensiones del EuroQol-5D, siendo el grupo en LEQ el más afectado (p < 0.001). Conclusiones: El confinamiento ha producido en pacientes con patología musculoesquelética un empeoramiento del dolor y de calidad de vida mayor que en el resto de personas, especialmente en aquéllas en espera de cirugía, traduciéndose en un aumento del consumo de analgésicos.

Abstract: Introduction: In March 2020, lockdown was established in Spain because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study is to assess its impact on pain and quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Material and methods: Prospective study including 490 individuals grouped in: 140 people without pain, 140 people with musculoskeletal pain but without any related pathology diagnosed, 140 patients diagnosed for a musculoskeletal condition and 70 patients in surgical waiting list (SWL) for a musculoskeletal condition. Data regarding pain, physical activity and quality of life (EuroQol-5D) was collected at the beginning of lockdown and one year after (March 2021). Results: Mean age was 53 ± 17.5 years old (18-88) and 51.3% were women. Patients in SWL referred significantly more pain than the rest of groups (p < 0.001), with a score in the visual analogue scale of 6.3 ± 1.9. Groups 3 and 4 suffered a significant increase of their pain from 2020 to 2021 (p < 0.001), while decreasing in group 2 (p < 0.001). Analgesics intake grew from 2020 to 2021 (39.9% versus 44.3%, p = 0.007). 70.2% experienced a worsening of at least one dimension of EuroQol-5D over last year, with patients in SWL being the most affected (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Lockdown has caused in patients with musculoskeletal conditions a greater aggravation of pain and deterioration of quality of life than in the general population, especially in patients in SWL, translating in an increase in analgesics intake.

Evolución clínico-radiológica a largo plazo en una serie de 26 pacientes con displasia de cadera del adulto sintomática tratados mediante osteotomía periacetabular bernesa / Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a serie of 26 cases of symptomatic adult developmental dysplasia of the hip managed with bernese periacetabular osteotomy

Objetivo. La displasia del desarrollo de cadera es causa frecuente de dolor coxofemoral del adulto joven. La osteotomía periacetabular bernesa se perfila como una forma de abordar el problema de dolor, limitación funcional y necesidad de artroplastia a edades tempranas en estos pacientes. Material y método. Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de 26 pacientes seleccionados con displasia del desarrollo de cadera sintomáticos, tratados mediante osteotomía periacetabular bernesa, entre 1996 y 2009 (mujeres 94%). La edad media en el momento de la cirugía era de 39,8 años (rango: 15-49), con seguimiento medio de 10 años. Valoramos radiológicamente evolución de artrosis (escala de Tönnis), índice acetabular y ángulo de Wiberg; funcionalmente utilizamos la escala de Merle-D’Aubigné-Postel. Resultados. El tiempo medio de hospitalización fue de 10 días. El valor radiográfico medio a los 10 años fue de índice acetabular: 9,03° y ángulo de Wiberg: 38,3° (corrección de 17° y 27° respectivamente, sobre valores medios preoperatorios). El 43% refería bloqueo articular y el 53% fallo del miembro no evidenciable. Valor promedio funcional de 14,30 (bueno). A los 5 años de seguimiento, el 20% progresó en al menos un grado según la escala de Tönnis respecto a su estado preoperatorio, y a los 10 años, el 55%. A largo plazo, el 83% de los pacientes no precisó artroplastia a los 10 años y el 85% de nuestros pacientes confesó alto grado de satisfacción. Conclusiones. La osteotomía periacetabular bernesa es una alternativa terapéutica útil en adultos jóvenes con displasia del desarrollo de cadera sintomática, mejorando el dolor, la cobertura cefálica femoral y retrasando la progresión de osteoartrosis coxofemoral (AU)

Objective. Developmental hip dysplasia is a frequent cause of coxofemoral pain in young adults. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy emerges as a possible option for the management of pain relief and functional limitation, in order to delay the need for arthroplasty in these patients. Material and methods. A descriptive-retrospective study was conducted on 26 selected patients with symptomatic developmental hip dysplasia treated with bernese periacetabular osteotomy between 1996 and 2009 (94% women). Mean age at time of surgery was 39.8 y (15-49y), with a mean follow-up of 10 years. Osteoarthritis (OA Tönnis scale), acetabular index and Wiberg angle were evaluated by radiology and functionality was valued by using the de Merle-D’Aubigné-Postel scale. Results. The mean hospitalization time was 10 days. At 10 years, the mean radiography value of acetabular index was 9.03° and 38.3° for Wiberg angle (17° and 27° correction, respectively, above the mean pre-operative values). Joint lock was referred to by 43% of patients, and 53% to non-evidence based limb failure. Mean functional value was 14.30 (Good). At 5 years of follow-up, 20% advanced at least by one grade in OA Tönnis scale compared to their pre-operative status, increasing to 55% at 10 years. At 10 years after surgery, 83% patients did not need arthroplasty and 85% showed high satisfaction level. Conclusions. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy is a useful alternative in young adults with symptomatic developmental hip dysplasia that can improve pain relief, femoral head coverage, and slow down coxofemoral osteoarthrosis progression in order to delay arthroplasty (AU)

[Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a serie of 26 cases of symptomatic adult developmental dysplasia of the hip managed with bernese periacetabular osteotomy]. / Evolución clínico-radiológica a largo plazo en una serie de 26 pacientes con displasia de cadera del adulto sintomática tratados mediante osteotomía periacetabular bernesa.

OBJECTIVE: Developmental hip dysplasia is a frequent cause of coxofemoral pain in young adults. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy emerges as a possible option for the management of pain relief and functional limitation, in order to delay the need for arthroplasty in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive-retrospective study was conducted on 26 selected patients with symptomatic developmental hip dysplasia treated with bernese periacetabular osteotomy between 1996 and 2009 (94% women). Mean age at time of surgery was 39.8 y (15-49 y), with a mean follow-up of 10 years. Osteoarthritis (OA Tönnis scale), acetabular index and Wiberg angle were evaluated by radiology and functionality was valued by using the de Merle-D'Aubigné-Postel scale. RESULTS: The mean hospitalization time was 10 days. At 10 years, the mean radiography value of acetabular index was 9.03° and 38.3° for Wiberg angle (17° and 27° correction, respectively, above the mean pre-operative values). Joint lock was referred to by 43% of patients, and 53% to non-evidence based limb failure. Mean functional value was 14.30 (Good). At 5 years of follow-up, 20% advanced at least by one grade in OA Tönnis scale compared to their pre-operative status, increasing to 55% at 10 years. At 10 years after surgery, 83% patients did not need arthroplasty and 85% showed high satisfaction level. CONCLUSIONS: Bernese periacetabular osteotomy is a useful alternative in young adults with symptomatic developmental hip dysplasia that can improve pain relief, femoral head coverage, and slow down coxofemoral osteoarthrosis progression in order to delay arthroplasty.